By now, anyone who works in the real estate industry is likely to have heard of Basel III and the new requirements for HVCRE Loans. But you may be asking: what is Basel III; what constitutes an HVCRE Loan; and what is the impact to a borrower in real estate deals? The alert below answers these questions.
What is Basel III?
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Committee”) is an international committee focused on the importance of adequate capitalization in a stable international banking system. To improve regulatory oversight and risk management in the banking sector following the 2008 financial crisis, the Committee adopted a new capital accord commonly referred to as “Basel III”. Congress mandated the adoption of Basel III in the United States when it passed The Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rules implementing Basel III took effect on January 1, 2015.
Recent attention on Basel III has focused on the increased risk weighting of certain High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Loans (or “HVCRE Loans”), and the corresponding increase in reserve requirements for banking organizations making such HVCRE Loans. A typical commercial real estate loan has a risk weighting of 100% and a capital requirement of 8%. This means that a bank must reserve at least $8 million in capital to make a $100 million loan. An HVCRE Loan is assigned a risk rating of 150%. This means that a bank must reserve at least $12 million in capital to make a $100 million HVCRE Loan (i.e. $4 million more in reserves).
An HVCRE Loan is any loan from a banking organization that finances the acquisition, development or construction of real property, which is not considered to be “permanent financing,” and specifically excludes: (1) loans on 1-4 unit residential properties; (2) community development loans; (3) agricultural loans and (4) commercial real estate loans which satisfy the following requirements:
The HVCRE regulations currently only apply to banking organizations, although there is some speculation that this could change to also include loans from insurance companies. Mortgage REITs and private equity funds that originate commercial real estate loans are not currently subject to HVCRE regulations.
“Permanent financing” is not defined in the regulations, but based on an FAQ published in April 2015 by the relevant federal banking agencies: (1) a loan does not constitute “permanent financing” if it will have future advances and the underwriting is based on the “as-completed” value of the project and (2) “permanent financing” requires, at a minimum, that the loan satisfy the lender’s “normal lending terms” and “underwriting criteria” for permanent loans.
Increased Pricing: If a loan is classified as an HVCRE Loan, the lender will face a lower return on its capital as a result of the higher capital reserve requirement. This will likely lead to increased pricing on the loan, including a higher interest rate, for the borrower. If possible, lenders will want to ensure that a loan is not classified as an HVCRE Loan. Borrowers should expect to see loan provisions addressing that the exemptions to being classified as an HVCRE Loan have been satisfied.
Required Capital: In the HVCRE Loan analysis, the loan-to-value requirement is a relatively straightforward calculation that is standard for all commercial real estate loans. The requirement that a borrower will be required to have contributed capital in the form of cash or unencumbered readily marketable assets of 15% of the project’s “as completed” value is more complicated. Since such capital must be contributed prior to the disbursement of any loan proceeds, this requirement may create obstacles to disbursement of loan proceeds at closing.
Borrowers should first understand what may be included as “capital” in the form of cash or unencumbered readily marketable assets. “Capital” includes cash paid to purchase land and out-of-pocket development expenses. It does not include: (1) the value of any contributed land (including any increase in land value that may result from improved market conditions or a project’s entitlements) or (2) any borrowed money or other collateral pledged in support of the loan, such as a second mortgage or an unsecured loan. It is unclear whether proceeds of a mezzanine loan or debt of a borrower’s parent entities may be included as “capital”, but a conservative lender would likely exclude such proceeds. This may cause certain joint venture structures to look more attractive. Furthermore, the capital contribution requirements are based on the “as-completed” value of a project rather than a project’s cost, which is a change from conventional underwriting practices, and may increase the required capital contribution for any given project.
Capital Must Remain in the Project: Borrowers must also be aware of issues related to the requirement that a borrower’s contributed capital and internally generated capital remain in the project until the project is sold, or the loan is paid in full or converted to permanent financing. This requirement prohibits a borrower from making distributions of any contributed equity and traps net operating income in the project, in each case, during the life of the loan. It is unclear whether income generated by the project can be applied to cover a project’s expenses. Borrowers should therefore expect to see increases in required reserves to cover a project’s carrying costs.
Cost Provisions: Borrowers may be tempted to let the lender focus on the details of ensuring a loan satisfies the requirements necessary to avoid classification as an HVCRE Loan; however, it is in a borrower’s best interests to focus on this issue as well. If a loan is determined after closing to constitute an HVCRE Loan and the lender faces higher reserve requirements and capital costs as a result, the lender may attempt to pass these costs onto the borrower through the general cost and indemnification provisions that are standard in most loan documents. Borrowers should also be on the lookout for any new or special provisions specifically related to such costs.
The attorneys at Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass are well-versed in the nuances of the new Basel III regulatory requirements. Should you have any questions or require additional information, or are interested in counseling on a specific project, please contact Erica Weber or Kyle Recker.